Social Construction of Technology dalam Perspektif Global
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studi ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan tinjauan sistematis terhadap pendekatan Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) dalam berbagai konteks global dengan menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) yang mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA 2020. SCOT memandang bahwa perkembangan teknologi bukan semata-mata ditentukan oleh aspek teknis, melainkan hasil dari proses sosial, interaksi, serta negosiasi makna yang melibatkan berbagai kelompok sosial. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi 31 artikel jurnal internasional yang relevan dari basis data Scopus pada periode 2020–2025 melalui lima tahapan PRISMA: formulasi pertanyaan penelitian, penetapan kriteria seleksi, pemilihan artikel, penyaringan literatur, dan ekstraksi data. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa teori SCOT diterapkan luas pada domain teknologi (48,4%), masyarakat (35,5%), dan komunikasi (12,9%), dengan dimensi inovasi sebagai fokus utama. Mayoritas penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif (83,87%), dan sebagian kecil mengadopsi metode campuran. Kontribusi terbesar berasal dari penulis di Inggris, Amerika Serikat, dan Belanda. Namun, temuan penting dari studi ini adalah masih minimnya eksplorasi terhadap dimensi komunikasi dalam studi-studi SCOT, padahal komunikasi memainkan peran sentral dalam proses interpretative flexibility, yaitu pembentukan makna teknologi melalui interaksi sosial. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan integrasi lebih kuat antara pendekatan SCOT dan perspektif komunikasi dalam menganalisis konstruksi sosial teknologi. Secara metodologis, pendekatan bibliometrik dan critical discourse analysis juga dapat dikombinasikan untuk menelusuri dinamika wacana sosial yang membentuk penerimaan atau resistensi terhadap teknologi. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis dan praktis bagi pengembangan kajian teknologi dan masyarakat yang lebih kontekstual dan inklusif, serta menekankan pentingnya partisipasi aktif kelompok sosial dalam perencanaan dan pengembangan teknologi yang berkelanjutan dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan budaya masyarakat.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adler, R. B., Rodman, G. R., & DuPre, A. (2014). Understanding human communication. Oxford University Press.
Ashfina, R. (2019). Utilizing Technology to Address Socio Economic and Environmental Challenges from Japans Society 5.0. Center for Digital Society. https://doi.org/10.36548/jsws.2019.2
Basu, S. (2023). Three Decades of Social Construction of Technology: Dynamic Yet Fuzzy? The Methodological Conundrum. Social Epistemology, 37(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2120783
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1993). The social construction of technological systems. The MIT Press.
Bou-Franch, P., & Blitvich, P. G.-C. (2019). Analyzing Digital Discourse. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6
Bozdag, A. A. (2023). AIsmosis and the pas de deux of human-AI interaction: Exploring the communicative dance between society and artificial intelligence. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202340. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13414
Castells, M. (2023). The Network Society Revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 940–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092803
Choi, K., & Kim, Y. (2017). Easing Cross-Border Communication: MOBILE-mediated Communication and Its Framework. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.042
Fast, K. (2018). A Discursive Approach to Mediatisation: Corporate Technology Discourse and the Trope of Media Indispensability. Media and Communication, 6(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1311
Fedorov, S. (2024). Enhancing Mobile Application Development with Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Implications. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(2), 1776–1779. https://doi.org/10.21275/ES24220102335
Fethi, B. J. A. (2018). Challenges of the Knowledge Society: Exploring the Case of Qatar. Global Economic Observer, 6(1).
Fulk, J. (1993). SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–950. https://doi.org/10.2307/256641
Garnham, N. (2000). Emancipation, the Media, and Modernity: Arguments about the Media and Social Theory. Oxford University Press USA.
Halich, A., Kutsevska, O., Korchagina, O., Kravchenko, O., & Fiedotova, N. (2023). The influence of social communications on the formation of public opinion of citizens during the war. Social Legal Studios, 6(3), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals3.2023.43
Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatized Worlds — Understanding Everyday Mediatization. In Mediatized Worlds (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_1
Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
Hubner, S., Blaskewicz Boron, J., & Fruhling, A. (2022). Use of Assistive and Interactive Technology and Relation to Quality of Life in Aging Adults. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.509
Indrawati, R. S., & Irwansyah, I. (2022). Konstruksi Sosial Teknologi dalam Fenomena Fitur Try On pada Pemilihan Produk di Katalog Digital Kosmetik. Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.32670/ht.v2i1.2642
Jacobs, I. (2023). The World Wide Web Consortium. In Linking the World’s Information (pp. 155–165). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591366.3591380
Kenaw, S. (2006). The Social Construction of Technology: Media’s Role in “Disturbing” the Stabilization of Finchaa’s Ethanol-Kerosene Blend (‘K-50’). Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 683-2016–46844, 103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.249859
Marinakis, Y., Walsh, S. T., & Harms, R. (2024). Age Matters: How Generational Decision-Making Cohorts Affect Disruptive Technology New Product Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3116204
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Olsen, O. E., & Engen, O. A. (2007). Technological change as a trade-off between social construction and technological paradigms. Technology in Society, 29(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.006
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984a). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984b). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Prell, C. (2009). Rethinking the Social Construction of Technology through ‘Following the Actors’: A Reappraisal of Technological Frames. Sociological Research Online, 14(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1913
Quesada-González, D., & Merkoçi, A. (2017). Mobile phone-based biosensing: An emerging “diagnostic and communication” technology. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 92, 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.062
Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. L. (2022). Digital society: risks and challenges. Culture E Studi Del Sociale, 7(1), 3–9.
Ryan, T., Ryan, N., & Hynes, B. (2024). The integration of human and non-human actors to advance healthcare delivery: unpacking the role of actor-network theory, a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11866-4
Sarrocco, C., & Kelly, T. (2002). Elements and Principles of the Information Society. ITU - WSIS.
Sergeeva, N., & Liu, N. (2019). Social construction of innovation and the role of innovation brokers in the construction sector. Construction Innovation, 20(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2019-0016
Skinner, R. A., Napier, J., & Fyfe, N. R. (2021). The social construction of 101 non-emergency video relay services for deaf signers. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 23(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355720974703
Skolnikoff, E. B. (1993). The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton University Press.
Wibowo, T. O. (2024). The Social Construction of Technology for the Use of CHATGPT in Indonesia. ETTISAL : Journal of Communication, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v9i1.11479
Winner, L. (1993). Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800306
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971